Our commitment
Nobody can guarantee you first place - here is the proof
Some tools sell a number-one spot in AI answers. We measured how much those answers change from one identical run to the next - here is why that promise cannot be kept, by anyone, us included.
Ask the same question ten times
We asked the same question, word for word, to the same assistants, several times in a row. Two identical runs only overlap by 62 to 76% depending on the trade - a quarter of the list changes with nothing changed.
First place holds up better: the top brand stays the same in 81% of runs. But there is no such thing as THE first place - there is one per language and per engine, where you would expect one, our measurements count eight.
What variance still lets you measure
A single run is noise. A series of spaced re-measures is a measurement: the trend of your visibility, the competitors who keep coming back, the sources the assistants read before recommending. That is stable, datable, and checkable.
Our own measurements show it: three days apart costs only 6 points, while a change of phrasing costs 46. What matters is not when you measure - it is measuring repeatedly, identically, and reading the curve.
Our commitment: a dated proof, not a promise
Waseit will never promise you a position. Here is what we do instead, all of it checkable:
- Every audit is dated, re-measured every 3 days on a subscription, and the report shares by link - the proof travels with the number.
- Our methodology is public, limitations included: a sample, not a census.
- We publish our own score - even when it is bad. It is, and it sits on our homepage.
- Every claim in our studies cites its collection: date, volume, engines queried.