Skip to content
Waseit
← All articles
AEOGEO

Your trade decides, not your city

300 measurements, 16 markets: two trades in the same city share almost no sources, while one trade across two cities shares five times more. What it changes for your listings.

3%

shared sources between two trades in the same city

September 6, 20268 min read
In this article
  1. What we measured
  2. The business next door does not have your doors
  3. The same trade elsewhere does look like you
  4. Nine markets out of nine, without exception
  5. And no door is worldwide
  6. What this measurement does not prove
  7. What it changes for you

Short answer: the sites an AI reads to answer about you depend on your trade far more than on your city. We measured 300 trade-city combinations across 16 markets. Two trades on the same street share almost nothing - half the pairs have no source in common. The same trade in two different cities shares five times more. The consequence is direct: look at what your peers elsewhere are doing, not at the shop next door.

17%

between the same trade in two different cities

9 of 9

markets where the trade outweighs the city

In London, an architect, a dentist and a plumber share not one source. A dentist in London and a dentist in Manchester do.

What we measured

A cell is a triplet: a market, a trade, a city. For each one we ask three unbranded questions - « what are the best X in Y? » - in the market's language, and we record the addresses the AI assistant actually consulted to answer. Perplexity is the only one of the three AI assistants we query that publishes its sources: this measurement therefore rests on it alone, and we say so before the numbers rather than in a footnote.

On 5 September 2026 that gives 300 cells, 16 markets, 95 trades, 115 cities and 896 answers read, for 2,299 distinct domains cited. From each cell we keep the twelve most-cited domains: twelve is our ceiling, not a finding.

The question asked here was never asked in our earlier measurements. On 29 August we counted how many doors each city has. Today we ask what decides those doors: where you work, or what you do.

The business next door does not have your doors

Across 898 pairs of trades sharing a city, the average source overlap is 3%. In 442 of those pairs, nearly one in two, there is no shared source at all. London shows it at its sharpest: four trades, four watertight source worlds.

The three most-cited sources per trade, London, measured 5 September 2026. No domain appears twice in this table.
Trade in LondonMost-cited sources
Architectlondonbest.uk, houzz.com, architectsup.co.uk
Dentistdoctify.com, topdoctors.co.uk, doctory.uk
Plumbercheckatrade.com, mybuilder.com, ratedpeople.com
Veterinarianaboutdogs.co.uk, allvets.co.uk, dnavetcare.co.uk

This contradicts a widespread habit: asking a local shop owner which directory « works around here ». Their answer is true for them and worthless for you. The London plumber lives on tradesperson marketplaces; the dentist lives on medical directories. They meet nowhere.

The same trade elsewhere does look like you

Across 446 pairs made of the same trade in two different cities of the same market, average overlap rises to 17%, and only 7% of pairs share nothing. Five to six times better than geographic proximity.

Same trade, two cities: the sources repeat. Three most-cited sources, measured 5 September 2026.
Trade and marketCity ACity BShared sources out of 12
Dentist, United StatesSan Antonio: reddit.com, doctor.webmd.com, healthgrades.comDallas: yellowpages.com, doctor.webmd.com, healthgrades.com5
Lawyer, FranceRennes: starofservice.com, annuaire-avocats-france.fr, alexia.frAuvergne-Rhone-Alpes: annuaire-avocats-france.fr, alexia.fr, juritravail.com5
Lawyer, PolandWarsaw: oferteo.pl, tujestprawnik.pl, ratingcaptain.comKrakow: oferteo.pl, tujestprawnik.pl, orlyprawa.pl3

Nine markets out of nine, without exception

We ran the calculation market by market, keeping only those with at least three cities and three trades. The trade beats the city everywhere, from the Gulf to Brazil, and the gap ranges from threefold to twenty-fivefold.

Average source overlap, by market. Measured 5 September 2026, 300 cells.
MarketCellsSame city, two tradesSame trade, two cities
Poland496%17%
Brazil423%21%
United States401%15%
United Kingdom312%15%
France304%20%
United Arab Emirates223%11%
Saudi Arabia161%25%
Switzerland145%14%
Belgium74%29%

And no door is worldwide

If the trade decides, a given source should follow a trade from country to country. That holds, but weakly: of 2,299 domains cited, only 75 appear in more than one market, and none appears in all sixteen. Two cells drawn from two different markets share no source at all in 97% of cases.

The few domains that cross borders do so by trade, never by geography. Lawzana is cited in eleven markets, exclusively for lawyers. Booking.com in five, exclusively for hotels. Clutch.co in eight, for business services. The international door exists, but it is vertical.

The most international domains in the measurement, and the trade they belong to.
DomainMarketsCited for
lawzana.com11lawyers, only
clutch.co8business services
reddit.com7all trades
booking.com5hotels, only
bestlawyers.com5lawyers, only

One last figure puts directories back in their place: 79% of the domains cited appear in a single cell, and only 4% of those domains are directories in the classic sense. What the AI assistant reads is overwhelmingly an editorial page, a local ranking, a forum - not a trade directory you sign up to.

What this measurement does not prove

  • It rests on a single AI assistant, the only one that publishes its sources. We do not know whether ChatGPT and Gemini read the same sites, and we do not claim they do.
  • The 95 trades and 115 cities come from our own campaigns, not from a random draw of the world economy. Seven of the sixteen markets have too few cities to be compared, and are left out of the per-market table.
  • Being cited as a source does not mean being recommended. A source can be read and then ignored in the final answer.
  • Twelve sources per cell is a ceiling we chose; a cell may well hold more.

What it changes for you

Look for your sources by trade, not by city.

Ask your trade's question in another city of the same country: the sites that come back are your real doors.

Stop copying the shop next door.

One source in two has nothing to do with yours, and half the time there is no shared source at all.

Think vertically when you go international.

A stronghold of your trade can follow you across ten countries; no general-purpose one does.

Do not buy a listing before seeing the source cited.

Nine in ten of the sites the AI assistant reads are not directories and have no signup form: you get in through a mention, an article, a ranking.

You can run this measurement on your own trade and city in a minute, free and with no account, and see the sources cited in your place.

Frequently asked questions

What decides which sites the AI reads about me: my city or my trade?
Your trade, by a wide margin. Across 300 combinations measured in 16 markets, two trades in the same city share 3% of their sources on average, against 17% for the same trade in two different cities. In 9 out of 9 comparable markets, the trade wins.
Can I copy a neighbouring business's strategy?
No, and this is the sharpest result of the measurement: in nearly one pair out of two, two trades in the same city share no source at all. In London an architect, a dentist and a plumber do not share a single domain. Copy a peer in the same trade in another city instead.
Is there a worldwide directory I must be listed in?
There is none. Of 2,299 domains cited, 75 appear in more than one market and none in all sixteen. The few international sites are international by trade: Lawzana for lawyers in eleven markets, Booking.com for hotels in five.
Is getting listed in directories enough?
Directories account for only 4% of the domains cited in this measurement. The vast majority of what the AI assistant reads are editorial pages, rankings and forums, which you enter through a mention or an article rather than a signup form.